12/22/2021
- CASE WAS FILED WITH COURT
- CRIMINAL COST FOR CASES ON & AFTER 10/16/09 $92.00
- WARRANT WAS ISSUED FOR DEFENDANT FOR ARREST
12/27/2021
- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FILED BY ATTORNEY
12/29/2021
- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, PLEA OF NOT GUILTY, TIME WAIVER,
- REQUET FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING AND PERSONAL BOND FILED BY
- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FILED BY DEFENDANT
- DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY FILED
- MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FILED BY ATTY
- STOURTON SCOTT SMITH(GRANTED)
12/30/2021
- WARRANT WAS RECALLED - ALPD/KN
- CASE SET FOR A INITIAL APPEAR ON 12/30/2021 AT 10:00 AM
- CASE SET FOR A PRELIMINARY ON 01/06/2022 AT 10:00 AM
- PRINTED NOTICE TO APPEAR FOR OFFICER FABRIZI, ANTHONY
- AGENCY SAL STATE OF OHIO (AL)
- DEFENDANT WILL REPRESENT HERSELF AT THE PRELIMINARY
- BOND SET AT $1,000.00 PERSONAL
01/04/2022
- STATE'S REQUEST FOR A COURT ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT TO
- SUBMIT TO TESTING AND TO SHOW PROOF THEREOF FORTHWITH FILED
- JUDGEMENT ENTRY - THE PROSECUTOR IN THIS CASE HAS REQUESTED
- THAT THE ACCUSED SUBMIT TO TESTING PURSUANT TO RC2921.38(E)
- TO DETERMINE IF THE DEFENDANT IS A CARRIER OF THE VIRUS
- THAT CAUSES ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME, IS A
- CARRIER OF A HEPATITIS VIRUS,OR IS INFECTED WITH
- THE DEFENDANT IS ORDERED TO SUBMIT TO ONE OR MORE
- APPROPRIATE TESTS TO MAKE THOSE DETERMINATIONS.
- DEFENDANT SHALL SUBMIT TO THESE TESTS THROUGH HER FAMILY
- PHYSICIAN AND PROVIDE THE RESULTS TO THE PROSECUOTR ON OR
- THE COSTS OF THE TESTS SHALL BE CHARGES TO THE ACCUSED
- UNLESS THE COURT DETERMINES THAT SHE IS UNABLE TO PAY, IN
- WHICH CASE THE COSTS SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE AVON LAKE
- POLICE DEPARTMENT IN WHOSE DETENTION THE ALLEGED OFFENSE
- CC:MAILED TO DEFT & COPY LEFT AT THE ALPD W/OTHER
- PAPERWORK THAT THE DEFENDANT IS PICKING UP.
01/05/2022
- COPIES OF NOTICES OF EMAIL SENT TO PARTIES GIVEN TO COURT
- MOTIONS 1 (ONE) THROUGH 4 (FOUR) FILED.
- 1)MOTION OPPOSING ORDER REQUIRING TESTING AND TO SHOW
- PROOF.2)MOTION TO REMOVE ALL CHARGES IN THEIR ENTIRETY FROM
- DEFT'S RECORD3)MOTION TO REMOVE DNA SAMPLE THAT WAS COLL-
- ECTED UNDER FALSE PRETENSES4)MOTION FOR CASE TO BE FILED
- WITH OHIO ATTY GENERAL DAVE YOST FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES TO BE
- BROUGHT AGAINST PATROLMEN FABRIZI #222 FOR AN UNGODLY NUM-
- BER OF COUNTS OF PERJURY IN VIOLATION OF ORC 2921.22
- EXHIBITS 1-14 INCLUDING EXHIBIT Z ATTACHED.
01/06/2022
- THE ABOVE THREE CASES ARE HEREBY DISMISSED AT PLAINTIFF'S
- COSTS. THE FACTS UPON WHICH THE THREE CHARGES ARE BASED
- WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE LORAIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
- FOR PRESENTMENT TO A GRAND JURY.
- FINGERPRINT CARD COMPLETED AND MAILED TO BCI
- COSTS 271.00, SUSP 271.00
- DISMISSED.TO BE FORWARDED TO LORAIN COUNTY GRAND JURY.
01/07/2022
- PAYMENT - RECEIPT NO. 2200037 IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 25.00
- MOTION TO SEAL RECORD FILED BY DEFT
- CASE SET FOR A MOTION TO SEAL ON 01/13/2022 AT 11:00 AM
- CASE DISMISSED - COSTS SUSPENDED $ -271.00
- MOTION TO DESTROY DNA SAMPLE COLLECTED 12/29/21 FILED BY
01/10/2022
- THE COURT ORDER CONTAINED IN THE JUDGMENT ENTRY DATED
- 1/4/2022 REGARDING THE PROSC'S REQUEST FOR DEFT TO SUBMIT
- TO TESTING PURSUANT TO RC 2921.38(E) IS VACATED DUE TO THE
- STATE'S DISMISSAL OF THE CHARGES.
01/13/2022
- DEFENDANT IN COURT REQUESTING TO HAVE THE RECORD SEALED.
- THESE CASES COME BEFORE THE COURT FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE
- DEFENDANT'S MOTION FILED ON 1/5/22. (1) MOTION OPPOSING
- ORDER REQUIRING TESTING (2) MOTION TO SEAL (3) MOTION TO
- EXPUNGE DNA SAMPLE (4) MOTION FOR OPENING OF CASE WITH OAG
- ON 1/6/22 THE STATE OF OHIO SUBMITTED AN ENTRY THAT WAS
- THEN SIGNED BY THE COURT DISMISSING THESE CASES WITH THE
- RIGHT TO SUBMIT THE FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES SUPPORTING THE
- CHARGES TO THE LORAIN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GRAND
- JURY. AS A RESULT OF THE DISMISSAL, THE COURT'S ORDER THAT
- THE DEFENDANT SUBMIT TO TESTING FOR VIRUS WAS VACATED BY
- THE MOTIONS TO SEAL THESE CASES AND TO EXPUNGE THE DNA
- SAMPLE CAME ON FOR HEARING ON 1/13/22. THE COURT FOUND THAT
- THE MOTIONS WERE NOT WELL TAKEN AT THIS TIME AND DENIED
- THEM ON THE BASIS THAT THE DISMISSALS WERE WITHOUT
- PREJUDICE(SINCE DISMISSAL SPECIFICALLY INDICATED THAT THE
- CHARGES WOULD BE PURSUED DIRECTLY WITH THE THE GRAND JURY)A
- THAT STATUE OF LIMITATIONS HAS NOT EXPIRED.
- R.C. 2953.52(B)(2)(A)(II). WITH REGARD TO MOTION TO OPEN A
- CASE WITH THE OAG, THE COURT FINDS THAT IT HAS NO AUTHORITY
- TO PURSUE SUCH A PROCEDURE AND THEREFORE DENIES THE MOTION.
|